Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Poll underscores ALP's double bind 

Poll underscores ALP's double bind

Prime Minister Julia Gillard is being dragged down by voter distrust and an intractable policy battle, while Tony Abbott's leadership could, perversely, ultimately be at risk because of rising expectations of a Coalition election victory.

This poll is another shocking result for Gillard. Her personal authority continues to erode. People have not got over her knifing of Kevin Rudd: this is indicated by the former PM's huge lead in a head-to-head contest. (Indeed the poll suggests that, regardless of the parties' views, the public would like the Rudd-Turnbull contest they were denied last time.)

Equally alarming for Labor, putting a price on carbon - the issue currently of most importance to the government - continues to get more unpopular.

While it is true governments easily lose support when they get into difficult arguments, Gillard has no electoral margin to cushion her. Although the carbon tax should be well in place when she faces voters, a debilitating fight could have taken an irreversible toll. Pulling up a 31 per cent ALP primary vote (its lowest since 1996) is a massive challenge.

The increasing public opposition to the carbon price (44 per cent in February; 59 per cent now) comes as the union movement is starting to panic and business is hyping up its compensation demands. The poll will strengthen the carbon tax's opponents and those agitating for the best deal for themselves.

For Labor, the worst is that it is boxed in. It can't dump a second PM. It can't retreat on a carbon price for a second time; it can only arbitrate as best it can between the competing claims and make its case to the public as effectively as possible.

The bad poll puts extra weight on the May 10 budget. Gillard has set a high bar for herself, talking up her reform package to get people from welfare to work.

If this disappoints by being a damp squib or too harsh, she'll either be condemned for not delivering or have a fresh row on her hands.

It's clear the government's onslaught on Abbott's negativity isn't working. Indeed, Labor might do better to obsess a little less over the opposition at this point in the political cycle - it may just underline Labor's insecurity.

But the poll shows Abbott himself has some insecurity to worry about, as support for Malcolm Turnbull as preferred leader continues to grow.

Voters might have been critical of Turnbull when he was leader, but in retrospect many hanker for him, especially Labor voters.

This is a worry for Abbott, because it's in Turnbull's DNA to want to be top dog and the next election is his best and probably his only chance to become PM.

Liberal MPs don't want to embrace Turnbull, but closer to an election, things could become rockier for Abbott - as they did for Kim Beazley in 2006 - if his followers smell victory but want still more insurance.

Michelle Grattan is Age political editor.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is noteworthy the Howard Govt in its second term had similar figures - up to 15 points behind Beazley. Will history repeat itself, only time will tell.
Posted by Progressive, 18/04/2011 9:56:13 AM
Gillard is sowing the reward of her own political deceit. Unlike Howard who put the GST to the electorate for endorsement, Gillard is trying to impose her job-destroying tax without allowing the people to pass judgement. Into the bargain, more people are now closely examining the exaggerated claims used by the Climate Change Cult to justify the CO2 tax. And on the key questions of by how much will this pernicious tax reduce the earth's temperature, and by when, all that's offered up is more Tim Flannery babble. Mind you, babble that comes with a hefty fee attached for services rendered by Tim. Strategically Tim would be better advised to focus his spruiking efforts on his major sponsors Panasonic and Toyota. As the more he says about the CO2 Tax, the more people come to realise just how contrived are his claims of doom and gloom. All of this is now showing through in the polls and won't change no matter how much of our coin Gillard throws into a major advertising blitz. If anything, resorting to a taxpayer funded spin campaign will just heighten the resentment held by an electorate that feels deceived.
Posted by JohnD, 18/04/2011 10:55:07 AM
JohnD you are way out of touch with the Australian people.
Posted by benito, 18/04/2011 5:49:56 PM
GST record:

Howard was confronted by a journalist who kept questioning, Howard, in frustration, re GST, said never ever.

Liebor traded on this.

But Howard announced tax reform including GST and campaigned for election on the basis of major tax reform. GST. abolition of WST, etc.

His government won that election.

Gil-Lard promised no carbon dioxide tax if elected.

She was short one seat.

The former independents and ONE GREEN enabled Gil-Lard to hang on.

Liebor has no mandate for carbon dioxide tax.

Don't let them get away with it.

Do not vote for RobO.


Posted by JohnT, 18/04/2011 8:07:49 PM
It is not fair to put Gillard & Howard in the same sentence. Howard at achievements he could list in his first term, she can't lay claim to one. This gov must go!
Posted by Aus, 19/04/2011 8:37:08 AM
Yes JohnD, not only did Howard argue the case for tax reform and GST during an election campaign (Labor argued it would mug the economy but it didn't) but he abolished WST and lowered the income tax scales the year the GST was implimented and every year thereafter.

It appears that the majority of Australians are brighter than Labor give them credit for, and they can spot a fraud-con.

The climate change arguement is a cunning basis for imposing a tax, they know Earth cools and warms, goes from ice ages to very hot periods, so climate change is real, but their tax would be economic suicide.

Check out the changes 4500BC to now:

http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm

Posted by JohnT, 19/04/2011 10:26:01 AM
AUS name one thing Howard did in his first term. Name one.
Posted by Oh No, 19/04/2011 12:25:04 PM
'Howard was confronted by a journalist who kept questioning, Howard, in frustration, re GST, said never ever.'

Oh deary me JohnT, you have changed your story. You said HE NEVER EVER SAID IT.

lol.


Posted by progressive, 19/04/2011 12:27:25 PM
JohnT thanks for the temperature change web reference. Very informative.
Posted by JohnD, 19/04/2011 1:04:45 PM
Benito the polls would suggest otherwise.
Posted by JohnD, 19/04/2011 1:18:35 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

Most popular articles




The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...