News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Chairlift bagged as theme park bid 

Chairlift bagged as theme park bid

06 Nov, 2009 09:22 AM
PLANS for a chairlift to the top of Mount Buffalo threaten to transform the iconic reserve into a theme park, the Victorian National Parks Association says.

Spokesman Philip Ingamells feared the Mount Buffalo Skyways project would compromise the national park’s natural beauty.

Do you think a chairlift to the top of Mount Buffalo is a good idea?

“We’re not really keen about that sort of thing,” he said of the Alpine Valleys Tourism Board suggestion.

“We think these things can destroy the ambience of natural places — we don’t want to change them into theme parks.

“We would much rather the money be spent on maintaining the natural values of the parks.”

Mr Ingamells said Mount Buffalo and its chalet would be ideal for guided adventures and education programs for youth.

“Of all Victoria’s national parks, Mount Buffalo is the one that is most ideally suited to introducing young people to experiences in the natural world,” he said.

“The chalet’s outdated accommodation is also more suited to young adventurers or back-packers than high-end tourism.”

The Mount Buffalo Skyways project is aimed at elevating the region’s tourism status.

It is expected to cost $20?million to $30?million and attract about 500,000 visitors a year.

Alpine Council has offered “in-principle” support, with Mayor Nino Mautone and Cr Daryl Pearce joining a sub-committee of the Alpine Valleys Tourism Board to investigate the project.

“A key part of the proposal was that the project team would develop a comprehensive strategy for the engagement of all stakeholders,” Cr Mautone said.

“It is very important that the team hears from everyone who has an interest in the mountain and the concept.”

The sub-committee will look into environmental threats, cultural heritage and complementary tourism opportunities.

It will report to council before seeking government funding for a feasibility study.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It's interesting to read all the reasons why we should or should not go ahead with this project. Many seem to have forgot that the best way to preserve something is to make it more accessable to everyone so that it becomes valuable. A further point is the best way to see all the views is by air and currently flights around Buffalo are rather expensive. Its time to get real and bring this magnificant mountain alive, do up the chalet, get power up there and add a skylift for all to enjoy all year round. Don't let it die as that achieves nothing but decay. Just look at many other so called National parks. What happens is they end up with ferral plants and animals all over the place. At least if the Mountain becomes a tourist haven it will be looked after. Too many are selfish and want it all to them selves, Yellow Stone in America gets many thousands of visitors a year and it is still pretty pristine.
Posted by Sailor Bill, 15/02/2010 11:12:51 PM, on The Border Mail
Surely this is just what the area needs,a modern, sophisticated means of transport to the top, experiencing such wonderful views and bringing people back to their mountain, surely tourism is to be embraced for this sensational area to be successful. and that stupid comment re Maccas & Kfc well it just shows the mentality of the opponents!!
Posted by Make it happen, 9/11/2009 3:07:33 PM, on The Border Mail
This will certainly turn into a debate between the people who'd like a sustainable tourism industry in NE Victoria (one with little or no snow) and the people who don't want to share this beautiful area with the majority. Ecotourism is the way to go. Mt Buffalo chalet, people, is shut. It is not in operation, therefore detracting visitors to the area. Get this chairlift in ASAP and start establishing a viable industry, with jobs, exposure to the environment, and stop your old fashioned attitudes towards tourism.
Posted by Dozer, 7/11/2009 1:31:45 PM, on The Border Mail
This is a silly idea, commerically and environmentally. There is not enough to do on top of Mt Buffalo to warrant this type of investment. Nor, is there any suitable accommodation or enough snow for viable winter activities. It would be a true white elephant. Something like this is more suitable for Falls Creek (Mt Beauty to FC), where there is already a large resort complex, built attractions and other activities. Commercially it might succeed, especially if it becomes a viable alternatie to winter driving up. Environmentall, though, it is challenging.
Posted by Bob, 6/11/2009 6:12:06 PM, on The Border Mail
A ski tube railway would not work-it is simply to steep-unlike the Kosciusko one where the height difference is much less and the distance greater. I'm sick of arguments justifying proposals on the basis of 'Jobs" and "Security"-using those criteria would justify building anything-why not a prison? Or a coliseum? Provision of subsidised shuttle buses would get people to the top who can't otherwise-and provide some employment! The major concern is the visual impact-it would have to run almost straight up the gorge- with pylons cars and cables spoiling a unique and special landscape. How will it affect other recreational use-hangliding for one? Spend the money on extending and improving the areas wonderful cycle trails and walk paths. Let us encourage physical actitvity. Such amenities would bring families and others back. Riding a gondola is likely to be a once only thing. Buffalo is an icon as it is. Let us not violate a grand old lady.
Posted by Steve, 6/11/2009 2:45:03 PM, on The Border Mail
I'm in favour of things staying as they are. Though its expensive to go skiing, and this is a stretch for me as I'm a bit impecunious and might manage 1 or 2 days in a resort, staying off-mountain, I'm concerned that any increase in on-mountain accommodation or significant reduction in the cost of lift tickets could create overcrowding and excessive demand, and attract an element of visitor which presents an increased risk of antisocial behavior around the resorts or mountain. I'm in favour however of increased camping or backpack accommodation off the mountain and limited camping/backpack accommodation on top and increased public transport by buses up there especially at a subsidised rate (vline anybody?) to promote increased use and less car traffic.
Posted by Shauna, 6/11/2009 12:25:42 PM, on The Border Mail
I agree totally with the Victorian National Parks Association view regarding the proposed chair life. It would be nothing more than a blot on the land scape . A monumental eye saw. The money would be better spent clearing walking tracks, providing more shelter and toilet facilities on the mountain itself. As a regular visitor and hiker I would hate to see the sites beauty destroyed by an ill conceived idea. I feel it's just another case of bureaucrates trying to be seen to be doing something. What better way to be noticed, come up with an outrageous proposal like this. It's a wonder they didn't include the building of a McDonalds and a KFC on the Gorge as part of the package.
Posted by leave Buffalo alone, 6/11/2009 11:12:30 AM, on The Border Mail
The Chairlift project will do the opposite to "theme parking" Mt Buffalo. It will bring visitors to see the natural beauty of the area. The drive up the mountain would burn more fossil fuels per visitor than the electric driven Chairlift. As long as the chairlift is driven by renewable energy (sourced from purchasing energy from Hydro scheme, or Green companies) then it's a winner for the environment, a winner for tourism, and a winner for Tourism Victoria. Look at what the Blue Mountains cable-ways does for Katoomba on an international level. The chairlift, including the historic chalet would certainly plant Mt. Buffalo, Porepunkah, Bright and Myrtleford more solidly on the international map as an attraction of natural beauty. People need to realize the area's tourism industry is threatened by climate change (snow/ski industry) so sustainable commerce such as this project needs to be put into place now, not 15 years when we have a failed ski industry.
Posted by Nic Wilke, 6/11/2009 9:53:13 AM, on The Border Mail
Perhaps a study should be carried out for a skitube alpine railway type development similar to the Perisher Blue resort area. The skitube runs through the national park and has limited visual impact and would allow access to the top of the mountain by all. As for transforming the park into a theme park as Philip Ingamells has stated, it is a aerial tramway, not a water slide! A skitube alpine railway or Skyways Project would not only generate tourism and cash inflow, it would provide jobs and security for the region and promote this iconic area further, rather than restricting access and promotion in its present form.
Posted by Bruce Ray, 6/11/2009 9:10:24 AM, on The Border Mail

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 5%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 5%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 1%
5) Samsung Galaxy S14 plans 6%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

 
 
Advertising Promotion


The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...