News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 College to review uniform policy 

College to review uniform policy

4/09/2008 5:07:00 PM
ORMISTON College has agreed to review the uniform policy that resulted in a 12-year-old Sikh student being refused enrolment unless he cut his hair and took off his turban.

The boy's family lodged a complaint with the Anti-Discrimination Commission Tribunal last year, claiming the school's enrolment policy amounted to religious discrimination.

The college defended its stance when the case came to media attention earlier this year, but has now apologised to the family as part of a confidential settlement.

Lawyer Scott McDougall, of Caxton Legal Centre, said the family, which could not be named due to a suppression order, was happy and relieved the issue was resolved outside of court.

He said the family members had not wanted to damage Ormiston College's reputation because they still believed it was a good school.

"My clients were motivated by the interests of all faiths and the Sikh community," he said.

"Hopefully other schools will take heed of the outcome of this case."

Ormiston College headmaster Brett Webster said it was "regrettable" the issue had arisen at all, but the school was happy with the resolution.

He said the school, which describes itself as independent and non-denominational, had apologised for any hurt caused and would review its enrolment practices and uniform policy during the next few months.

"There was a difference of opinion on uniform.

"There was never any intention to offend anybody or hurt anybody," Mr Webster said.

"Should we consider that there is a need to alter out enrolment practices and uniform policy to maintain alignment with Anti-Discrimitation legislation we will do so."

But Mr Webster said it was "too soon" to say whether Sikh students would now be allowed to wear turbans at the school as that decision depended on the findings of the uniform policy review.

The family involved in this case has moved from the Redlands and the boy is in Year 9 at a different private school.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The irorny of this issue is that the students parents have complained that their 'rights' have been infringed and they have suffered discrimination. However, is it not also the case that they have the option, and have subsequently taken it, to enrol into a school which has a more relaxed uniform policy? Moreover, is it not being discriminatory to the school, in challenging and forcing them only and no others, to alter their policies and behaviours to suit one section of the community who do not understand the meaning of uniformity? Whilst I understand the Sikh's wanting to be included, that was up to them, they simply needed to follow the uniform policy and enrol. Forcing religious traditions in dress into schools, businesses or government should not be acceptable. Uniform derives from uniformity and there is a point to uniformity in certain areas of society which should not be diluted.
Posted by Nathan Hall on 6/09/2008 12:08:15 PM
I again emphasise that there is no issue on complying with the dress code or uniform (for uniformity). It is the seemingly insensitivity on the part of school administration to appreciate the importance of religious code of conduct on unshorn hair for Sikhs. I cant see why the two lines of thought can not be blended to include a headgear (Matching with the color code of the school dress/stripes) for the Sikh students as is the policy world over.
Posted by SSK on 9/09/2008 12:47:18 PM
I respect Nathan Hall's contribution (6/9/2008) to this article and his distorted opinion. But Ormiston is a "multi-religious" institution with no fixed affiliation. Its former better 'éducated' principal had allowed a Sikh boy with turban to study there before and obviously knew it was the right thing to do. If Webster wants to insist on uniformity, then no student should allowed to wear crosses, ear-rings and jewelleries and all haricuts styles must be the same. So, Nathan, your theory on uniformity is now shot down. Assuming that Webster is right, then all the other schools in Australia is wrong. Why didn't he allow the court to decide ? It could have then certainly become a landmark ruling.
Posted by Charlie Chan on 9/09/2008 2:52:59 PM
I do agree with SSK about the uniform policy that sikh students wear the same coloured turban as the hat as is the policy in the whole world.
Posted by MSP on 10/09/2008 10:41:16 AM
SSK on 9/09/2008, I congratuate on your forward thinking. Actually, the Sikhs need not wear fully turbans. They are allowed to tie their hairs into knots on tops of heads as long as they are not required to cut their hairs. Then they can wear the school hats. They are similar to those Indian sportsmen who do not wear full turbans. Ormiston should have learnt about their customs first before making a fool of themselves.
Posted by Charlie Chan on 10/09/2008 10:57:09 AM
What is a religious belief but a rational belief in somethin irrational. To compare a student wearing earings or a cross around their neck (Charlie Chan) to the wearing of a turaban is fatally flawed. Earings are without doubt a part of our Australian culture and charachter, and a cross is usually worn beneath clothing. Should one stand back to observe a class as a whole, the slight differences in dress would not be noticed without further observations. On the other hand it would be patently obvious to the reasonable person, that a turbin or other religious head dress would make the student readily identifiable and distinct from the group. This is not uniformity. A question must be asked, where will challenges to the rights of orginisations stop? For instance in the UK Muslims are on record for refusing to Guard the Israeli embassy due to religous grounds even though their code is to protect all elements of the community. The religous grounds of refusal were accepted. Prima facie, so long as a religous ground can be found for objection to standards and traditions or rules of a country they are free to disregard our values! This, in my opinion, in not acceptable and should not be tollerated. Religion is a personal belief and feeling to the believer. Externalisation of their beliefs in organisations or schools which don't want it should not have it forced upon them by duress!
Posted by Nathan Hall on 10/09/2008 2:30:48 PM
It was quoted in The Australian that the school has made a public apology but in this article I did not see any public apology being made by Mr. Webster.
Posted by MSP on 10/09/2008 6:19:01 PM
Nathan Hall on 10/09/2008, please don't indulge in verbosity. We don't know what you are getting it. You seems to be an expert on turban when you don't even how to spell it. You need to buy a dictionary if you want to be verbose. To say that crosses are usually wear underneath dresses is also fatally flawed too.
Posted by Tony Sprey on 12/09/2008 9:40:22 PM
Nathan Hall, this is Australia and everyone should be given a fair go.. When you can't even spell turban correctly, all your ramblings become meanlingless. Since you are ignorant about wearing of turbans, please let me educate you as to a previous legal precedence in Qld. More than 10 years ago, a Sikh man was refused enrolment in our Police force as he had to wear a turban. Our court ruled against the QP. You can still see his picture in QP poster. So your argument and desire are now futile. Ormiston College had to apologise and paid compensation. So if you don't like it, you are at a liberty to find another school. But I am sure, you won't find any school that shares your distorted views.
Posted by John Lee on 13/09/2008 11:15:29 AM
Nathan Hall on 10/09/2008 2:30:48 PM Your justifications with all the verbosity were completely out of context in our Australian society. Your arguments were also flawed. When is wearing earrings an Australian culture? When is hiding crosses inside dresses a normal practice. Ormiston College also has a hairdo policy where boys are not allowed crew-cut. Hall, please let us know if all boys / girls should have the same type of hairdos, if you want visible uniformity. And last of all, please buy yourself a dictionary. 6 spelling mistakes ?
Posted by Maxim Tan on 15/09/2008 10:59:05 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

14/11/2008 | There isn't any doubt any more about whether Deputy PM, Julia Gillard, has the killer instinct. The problem tends more to be how to drag her off the victim's body.
click here to place your ad
 
Click to find out more
 
Domain.com.au
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...