News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Dog attack penalty a joke, says magistrate 

Dog attack penalty a joke, says magistrate

08 Sep, 2010 09:59 AM
A MAGISTRATE yesterday said “it was a joke” he could not consider a jail term for a widow charged over a series of dog attacks at Wahgunyah which left an elderly woman hospitalised and shocked children and adults.

John Murphy lamented a law that sees magistrates unable to jail dog owners over attacks unless their animal has already been declared a dangerous dog by a local council.

Should jail terms apply if a dog, which is not declared to be dangerous, attacks a person? Click here and have your say

At the time Maxine Smith’s dog Diesel bit grandmother Margaret Phemister on the bottom at Easter it had already menaced several other people but had not been deemed dangerous by Indigo Shire because the council was unaware of its string of run-ins with Wahgunyah residents dating back to August last year.

Wodonga Court heard yesterday Diesel, a male bull mastiff-great dane cross, and his fellow pet Angel, a female bull mastiff-great dane-bull abb cross, rushed at children as young as 11 months old as well as a range of elderly residents.

Smith, 38, of Blanche Street, Wahgunyah, pleaded guilty in Wodonga Court to five charges of being the owner of a dog which worried a person, five of being the owner of a dog found at large, three of owning an unregistered dog and single counts of owning a dog which rushed, owning a dog which caused serious injury and owning a dog which caused injury.

Mr Murphy was appalled by the attacks, saying “it was lucky no one was killed”.

“I’v e been farming for 25 years at my own property and I’ve never heard of anything as bad, it’s just outrageous.”

He added that “it’s a joke” he could not contemplate a jail penalty because of the lack of dangerous dog status.

“I would have considered a jail sentence here but I don’t have the power,” Mr Murphy said.

“My hands are tied, I can only fine her.”

Mr Murphy convicted Smith and ordered her to do 150 hours of unpaid work over 12 months after she decided to convert fines into a work order.

He directed the dogs be destroyed, saying “you would be risking someone’s life” if they were released from the pound where they have been held since Easter.

Smith’s solicitor Ross Kearney said his client, who became a widow after husband died in a car crash, was “deeply remorseful” and “absolutely shocked” when she learned the dogs had been rampant.

“She feels totally embarrassed, very humiliated and also deeply sorry that elderly people in Wahgunyah have been subjected to what can only be described as terrorising behaviour,” Mr Kearney said.

He noted Diesel and Angel belonged to Christie Lord, 16, the girlfriend of Smith’s son Kelvin, but as the only adult living at the property Smith was responsible for the dogs.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
i don think the first attack should mean jail time - sometimes these things happen by accident this dog however, was known to have attacked before, and i think serious penalties should be considered I understand that people have strong attachments to their pets, but unfortuneately sometimes you have to make the hard decisions. If you cant restrain them, put them down.
Posted by bec, 8/09/2010 11:48:14 AM, on The Border Mail
We as a society are way too soft on damn dogs. One bite and the dog gets put down. Simple. If my child was bitten, then the dog would be destroyed by any means.
Posted by Too Soft, 8/09/2010 11:55:48 AM, on The Border Mail
As a dog owner, if my dog was to bite someone and it was the first time or incident of the kind, I would not like the idea of being penalised by serving time in jail. But to be a dog owner you need to be responsible. If your dogs are in public you need to be responsible for them. Even in my own yard I refuse to let children or visitors outside with my dogs unsupervised. I have no fear of my dogs being aggressive, as they never have been in the past, but dogs are dogs!!
Posted by aaazzzzzzzzz, 8/09/2010 12:13:06 PM, on The Border Mail
jail for dog attack is fairly extreme dont you think. i grew up with 2 rottweilers and they never hurt anyone in the 16 years i had them. dogs take after their owners..like kids take after mum and dad. there is not much of a difference between declared dangerous dogs and not, most of the time it comes back to the owner. treat your dog right and they'l treat others right.
Posted by Goblin, 8/09/2010 12:15:37 PM, on The Border Mail
Jail - Extreme - I don't think so. Imagine if it was your mother or grandmother that had been attacked. The owner had been warned about the dog by police the night before the attack yet did nothing to prevent the further attacks. Shameful.
Posted by Enoughs Enough, 8/09/2010 1:25:00 PM, on The Border Mail
I can't believe the owner of the dog has the hide to appeal the notice to destroy the dog. Obviously not remorseful for what happened and quite willing to put the community in danger. Categorise the dog as a dangerous dog until it is destroyed.
Posted by lambchop, 9/09/2010 12:37:55 PM, on The Border Mail

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...