News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Fluoride for Howlong and Corowa 

Fluoride for Howlong and Corowa

28 Dec, 2011 12:00 AM
FLUORIDE should be introduced at Corowa and Howlong by July, more than five years after a divided shire council voted tentatively in favour of adding the chemical.

Mulwala township is also scheduled to get fluoridated water but the council is still waiting for Thales to determine how its explosives factory can receive a non-fluoridated supply separate from the town supply.

Councillors voted 5-4 in early 2007 to investigate options for fluoride after learning that neighbouring Yarrawonga was likely to get fluoride as a widely accepted teeth protection measure.

But the issue was debated hotly in 2009 and it wasn’t until April 2010 that Corowa councillors voted 6-2 to proceed.

Director of engineering John Babbs said the NSW Public Works Department had given him a program for adding fluoride at Corowa and Howlong.

It was finalising the contract documents and after tendering, assessments and approvals, expected that construction would occur after Easter.

The government pays for the equipment but the council will buy the chemical.

Corowa had for years defied the pro-fluoride policy of the NSW government, the Shires Association, the Australian Dental Association, the Australian Medical Association, the National Health and Medical Research Council and the World Health Organisation.

In 1998 the council chose not to fluoridate the Corowa township water supply after a survey of 2300 people found 58 per cent were opposed, and Howlong people expressed similar opposed about the same time.

A new filtration plant for Corowa was built with provision for fluoridation if public opinion changed, or if legislation was passed to make it mandatory.

Mulwala dentist Dr John Charles repeatedly urged the council to introduce fluoride.

The issue of the explosives factory requiring a non-fluoride supply because of its chemical processes has dragged on for several months but consultants GHD is now examining the problem.

Explosives production involves chemicals such as nitric acid, sulphuric acid, mercury, cadmium, ethyl ether, ethanol and acetone.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Corowa council should ask for the statistics on how water fluoridation has affected the dental waiting lists and childhood caries stats in Wangaratta, where fluoridation has been in place for a number of years now. This should reveal whether fluoridation is working or not to reduce dental cavities. My prediction is that they will not be able to obtain the information, one would need to ask why if this turns out to be the case.
Posted by Jac, 28/12/2011 8:09:49 AM, on The Border Mail
The people of Corowa need to investigate the medical side effects of water fluoridation.

Understanding why the US EPA Union stands strongly opposed to the practice, the serious health consequences of natural fluoride throughout much of India and China, and why so few, less than 5 percent of the planet population, are drinking artificially fluoridated water.

Perhaps start with the factual flyers for Oceania at bit.ly/F-AUS which highlight the serious cost to human health, for example the lowered IQ and learning difficulties in children that have been abundantly confirmed and peer reviewed.

Posted by Lightfoot, 28/12/2011 10:03:00 AM, on The Border Mail
Even if the addition of fluoride to our water supply provides a benefit - which I doubt, I don't agree with the mass medication of an entire population providing not to even save lives but just to prevent tooth decay. If the Government can force this on an entire population why can't they for instance force life saving measures on the population such as limited vehicle engine sizes on inexperienced drivers? Is tooth decay more important than saving lives or is there some other motive behind fluoride?
Posted by Bill Northwood, 28/12/2011 10:34:04 AM, on The Border Mail
It's obvious that this is a commie plot to contaminate our precious bodily fluids.
Posted by rooroo, 28/12/2011 12:11:10 PM, on The Border Mail
Believe that Howlong should have a meeting concerning this topic.

Please look at the Facebook page What's on in Howlong. there is an obvious debate on this subject which the Council should hold a meeting and made Howlong resisidents aware of the meeting's date and location.

Posted by Natalie Heald, 30/12/2011 6:47:38 AM, on The Border Mail
Spot on, Jac, Lightfoot, Bill, & Natalie! And consider this also: fluoridated water, which we swallow, is industrial grade, and as such, is dirt cheap. The fluoride in toothpaste though, which we spit out, is pharmaceutical grade and much more expensive. Quite appropriately, considering it's high quality. Make sense to you?... that we swallow the cheap & nasty stuff, and spit out the good stuff! I smell a rat. Add to that, that most of western Europe has abandoned water fluoridation. Must be a good reason.
Posted by Steph, 30/12/2011 4:12:17 PM, on The Border Mail
I strongly believe the Council whom work in the interest of its Shire, not have the right to vote on this, simply boycotting its residents without a formal meeting to actually see if Howlong wants it. As this has been tried before by the Shire (Hume) prior to change of hands and Howlong did not want it. At least the Hume Shire showed interest in Howlong Residents, this Shire doesnt seem to care. Not happy.
Posted by Natalie Heald, 17/02/2012 8:28:59 PM, on The Border Mail

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...