News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 MP slams censored papers 

MP slams censored papers

07 Feb, 2012 12:00 AM
SOPHIE Mirabella has asked an appeals tribunal to overrule censorship of Victoria Police papers detailing how Wangaratta’s Bruck Textiles lost a $1 million contract to China.

The federal member for Indi says after months of waiting the freedom of information material was too heavily censored to make any sense of the “secret deal”.

Mrs Mirabella first appealed to the police and late last week asked the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to review the reasons “large chunks” of information were excluded from her request.

“The certificate of exemption which details why they did not need to go to tender has been heavily censored,” she said.

“A significant part of the information has been blacked out.

“I don’t know what they are covering up but it’s not good enough.

“I have now lodged an application with VCAT to review that decision because I’m not satisfied the information provided to me adequately explains why there was no open tender and why it was secretly given to an offshore company.”

Queensland-base d Trade Import Services, which sources its fabric from China, won an interim deal to supply the soon-to-be phased-out blue and white shirts for Victorian police officers last June.

The $973,274 contract was never publicly advertised.

The contract, for fabric previously supplied by Bruck, was awarded without a tender process in a police decision.

The freedon or information documents obtained by Mrs Mirabella show Victoria Police first dealt with Trade Import Services in 2005 and was impressed by its ability to deliver on time and quality.

The documents say the contract was an interim one, pending a deal to supply dark-blue material for the new “New York-style” uniform.

But it also suggests the contract maybe extended if the new uniforms were delayed.

A covering letter from Victoria Police says the information censored contained personal details of bureaucrats and information that could impact on the tender for the new uniforms.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why is it that the Victorian Police are the subject of Sophie's anger and not the relevant Minister, National Party Leader Peter Ryan?

Is Minister Ryan innocent of any knowledge of this matter? Are we meant to believe that?

Posted by Indii, 7/02/2012 8:21:41 AM, on The Border Mail
Get this embarrassment out of our hair please. She is supposed to be industry minister and all she does is whinge and moan. Can we swap her for Susan Ley? Please?
Posted by Elbogrease, 7/02/2012 8:21:58 AM, on The Border Mail
So, if and when the additional information is released, what happens? As a federal Member in opposition how will she influence the State-run Victorian Police?
Posted by Shirley Knott, 7/02/2012 8:27:03 AM, on The Border Mail
Waste of time!

Just legislate that all government work needs to be done by Australian companies.

Problem solved.

Posted by Al Waysright, 7/02/2012 8:52:50 AM, on The Border Mail
Considering good ole Sophie is a member of the Noalition (please produce a policy without No in it Sophie) why doesn't she speak to the Liberal-National State Government. It's your own party Sophie stuffing up Victoria.
Posted by annoyed, 7/02/2012 10:10:08 AM, on The Border Mail
@ Al Waysright

Protectionism doesn't work, it allows industry to stagnate and only delays the inevitable.

Posted by Brian, 7/02/2012 11:09:40 AM, on The Border Mail
@ Brian

Well actually, if you cannot control 'Government spend' (tax payers money), then you won't have an industry... and what will that lead to?

Take Brucks out of Wangaratta... and what will happen to all those jobs, famalies, community?

I wouldn't call that stagnation.

Posted by Al Waysright, 7/02/2012 12:02:34 PM, on The Border Mail
@ Al Waysright

That would be structural unemployment. Yes it sucks but that's how the balance of economies work in the real world.

I don't want these contracts going to anyone else either but to force ALL contracts to be sold in Australia would make some of them unwanted and inevitably cancelled. Who wins then?

We're a value-adding economy, it's about time we focused on assisting workers in shrinking industries re-train and find work in growing trades rather than put walls up everywhere.

Like I said before, protectionism doesn't work.

Posted by Brian, 7/02/2012 12:48:53 PM, on The Border Mail
Hey Brian you say protectionism doesn't work. However you support building a multi million dollar tax office when they already have the rights to a perfectly good office already. You do this with the rationale that some local tradies are employed. I don't get your "economics"
Posted by Johnny, 7/02/2012 1:16:02 PM, on The Border Mail
China does not have Work Cover, so when workers are injured, a tiny amount of money is paid to the family, and it is a case of tough luck. They do not have a Carbon Tax either. Here is an idea that works well – Tariffs for countries that do not comply with our own standards. It is called equality in manufacturing. How on earth are we expected to compete unless we abolish our wages, slash our holidays, and extend a Carbon Tax to China – sound unrealistic? Alternatively work for $2 per hour! Sophie Mirabella can Dog Whistle alright, but that does nothing for jobs unfairly exported every day.
Posted by Dave, 7/02/2012 2:12:05 PM, on The Border Mail
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Sophie Mirabella
Sophie Mirabella

Most popular articles




The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...