News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Planned Wodonga phone tower "eyesore, health risk" 

Planned Wodonga phone tower "eyesore, health risk"

17 Sep, 2010 08:57 AM
A NEW mobile phone tower planned for Wodonga has residents concerned it would be a health risk, as well as a “blight” on a well-utilised public area.

Telstra has lodged a planning application with Wodonga Council to build a 25-metre tower on the Willow Rise greenbelt off Yarralumla Drive.

It is proposed the mobile network base station would provide additional capacity, depth of coverage and service quality in Wodonga and immediate surrounds.

Should a mobile phone tower be built on a popular greenbelt in Wodonga? Click here and have your say

But Amber Mikhail, who lives in nearby Wiltshire Crescent, was concerned mobile phone towers have in the past been linked with illnesses such as headaches, nausea, memory loss and in extreme cases, cancer.

“It may be argued that there is not enough evidence linking communication towers with health issues but there is no evidence to guarantee there is not,” she said.

“Increasing scientific research suggests there are major health risks within a minimum of a 400 to 500-metre radius of the tower.”

Wodonga’s Robert Toleman walks through the proposed location every day and fears a communications tower would be a “blight” on the landscape.

“It’s a beautiful public open reserve that a lot of people use and a lot of people enjoy,” he said.

“I don’t think we should be losing an area like that to Telstra.

“It shouldn’t be palmed off to anyone when it’s public land, owned by the ratepayers of Wodonga.”

Mr Toleman was also concerned he and other users of the site were not formally made aware of the application, with Wodonga Council sending notices to just 162 surrounding properties.

Telstra Country Wide Riverina Murray general manager Andrew Cottrill said a new tower was necessary, with the main base station in Wodonga, located on Huon Hill, experiencing a high volume of traffic.

He dismissed health concerns, saying the tower would have a “very low” level of emissions.

“It’s been subject to thousands of studies all around the world and we are absolutely compliant with world health standards,” Mr Cottrill said.

In regards to the appearance and location, Mr Cottrill said the monopole tower had been designed to have the lowest impact possible on the surrounding area.

“We understand people may have concerns — we urge them to have a look at the photomontage and description (included in the application), get a better understanding of what this would look like and make up their mind from there,” he said.

The planning application will be on display at the Wodonga Council offices until next Wednesday.

The council says all submissions regarding the application will be considered prior to a decision to grant the planning permit or not.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wah wah I have no reception! A new phone tower?! I WONT STAND FOR THIS!
Posted by KC, 17/09/2010 9:12:07 AM, on The Border Mail
Put it on a mountain. We have plenty of them.
Posted by Dave, 17/09/2010 11:24:58 AM, on The Border Mail
Not In My Back Yard syndrome.
Posted by Macca, 17/09/2010 11:29:52 AM, on The Border Mail
OMG ~ Overkill again... Complain about NO SERVICE some more maybe...!!! As for putting it on the Mountain ~ great in theory ~ but I think you'll find just as many "black-spots" for those located under the Tower then ~ as there is a void space then... Heaven help the day when everybody will be happy... :)
Posted by SyBelle, 17/09/2010 3:32:49 PM, on The Border Mail
Why dont we put the towers in the middle of round-a-bouts or in commercial-industrial areas that already have buildings, towers, etc. And it's not a case of "whinging" or "not in my backyard", it's about doing it properly the first time and not screwing it up. Bottom line - it takes brains and courage from the council. What are the chances?
Posted by mark, 17/09/2010 3:44:22 PM, on The Border Mail
Im an optus customer, but I think a phone tower would be good there.
Posted by h8ter!, 17/09/2010 8:52:54 PM, on The Border Mail
If developers can't put houses up there for profit, why let phone companies put towers up there for profit? It's violation of the same principal of not allowing blights on the hilltops!
Posted by wodonger, 19/09/2010 3:29:15 AM, on The Border Mail
People chose to live adjoining the greenbelt because it was a greenbelt - no development (and certainly no tower) should be allowed to be built there. There is also a conspicuous lack of open consultation on this - neighboring residents have not been notified by council. Sure towers are needed, but place them away from residential areas and area from existing greenbelts.
Posted by Greenbelter, 19/09/2010 10:05:49 PM, on The Border Mail
Why should local residents have to put up with potential health risks, as well as the degradation of this fantastic green space for the sake of bowing to Telstra's every demand. Take it elsewhere, there are plenty of localities that will provide similar reception opportunities with none of the impact on Wodonga's residents.
Posted by Dan, 20/09/2010 7:40:42 PM, on The Border Mail
We object to the discretionary use of power under the Wodonga Planning Scheme with respect to telecommunications facilities, in the case of this park. Wodonga Planning Scheme (Ref: Section21.09-3 The Hills) refers to the hills as “one of the most widely identified and supported environmental, lifestyle and community assets in Wodonga.” This hillside park, locally and commonly referred to as Willow Park, is the last remaining unspoiled natural bush grassland hillside which is surrounded by residential development. Notwithstanding the scheme provides that such telecommunications facilities “may be supported in recognition of the essential service they provide to the community”, this unique piece of parkland is highly used on a daily basis, and is a haven for lifestyle activities, exercise, picnics, bird watching, and simply just enjoyed for serenity and the unspoiled landscape. It would be a travesty to both present and future generations if the aesthetic serenity of this unique and valuable park vista is permanently denigrated through the use of discretionary authority.
Posted by Parkwalker, 21/09/2010 7:40:38 AM, on The Border Mail
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Border Mail







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...