News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Uniform contract to stay in Wangaratta: government 

Uniform contract to stay in Wangaratta: government

10 Feb, 2010 11:38 AM
THE federal government has rejected reports Australian soldiers are or will be wearing combat clothing sourced from China.

“Combat uniforms worn by Australian soldiers are manufactured in Australia,” junior defence minister Greg Combet said in a statement on Wednesday.

Mr Combet was responding to News Limited reports that Australian soldiers would be sent to war in uniforms with camouflage material made in China as part of a new round of defence cost cutting.

“There was never a requirement to use Chinese fabric on combat clothing,” he said.

The local manufacturer - Bendigo-based Australian Defence Apparel - was sourcing the fabric from Bruck Textiles, based in Wangaratta.

The contract with the government did contain an option, allowing the manufacturer to supply extra uniforms using fabric sourced from a Chinese company.

“This option has not been exercised by the Department of Defence and it will not be exercised,” Mr Combet said.

No Australian soldier currently deployed, or in training, was wearing combat uniforms made with Chinese fabric.Sophie Mirabella has slammed the Federal Government after revelations Australian soldiers will wear uniforms made from Chinese-produced camouflage.

The cost-cutting move is a major blow for Wangaratta's Bruck Textiles, which currently produces the material.

It has also heightened national security concerns.

“This Labor Government has created a culture of exporting Australian innovation to China,” said the member for Indi.

“It is actively discriminating against domestic companies in favour of foreign enterprises and facilitating the export of taxpayer funded technology overseas.

“Taxpayers may well ask, why spend hundreds of millions of dollars on research and development when contradictory government guidelines effectively facilitate the export of such R & D?

“The Government must review relevant procurement guidelines and practices to ensure we retain an indigenous manufacturing capacity to service the safety and security needs of Australian Defence."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
dont feel bad the usa is giving a chinese company 450 million dollars of taxpayer clean energy money to build wind generators employing 2000 chinese ,but the colorado senator said it would give the state 300 temporary construction jobs.lol
Posted by max, 10/02/2010 1:18:28 PM, on The Border Mail
'Outsourcing' is an ugly 'word', but an all too popular one. The chickens [no doubt GM artificial meat from 'Transylvonia'] will eventually come home to us to roost. If ideas like overseas product Australian Military uniforms are allowed to flower and bear fruit, unfortunately, it will be the community [nation] which bears the consequences. [Another example: Where does final control lie for telecommunications in Australia?] The real 'bottom line' is further down the page than simple immediate cash outlay sums. Sure, unnecessary waste should be avoided. But - short-sighted planning needs to be choked out of government activities. It is irrational to wear blinkers when writing cheques on the Reserve Bank Government Drawing Account [regardless of which Party has the pen].
Posted by AHT, 11/02/2010 9:06:30 AM, on The Border Mail

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...