Controversy over Nature magazine claims world's oldest fossils have been found

By Marcus Strom
Updated March 2 2017 - 6:08am, first published 5:08am
The rock structure in Canada where the fossils were found.  Photo: Nature/University College London
The rock structure in Canada where the fossils were found. Photo: Nature/University College London
Filaments from the Canadian rocks that scientists say show structural evidence of early bacterial life. Photo: Nature/UCL
Filaments from the Canadian rocks that scientists say show structural evidence of early bacterial life. Photo: Nature/UCL
Professor Franco Pirajno, geologist at the University of Western Australia, in the Earaheedy Basin in Western Australia. Photo: Franco Pirajno
Professor Franco Pirajno, geologist at the University of Western Australia, in the Earaheedy Basin in Western Australia. Photo: Franco Pirajno
Some of the rocks from Quebec. Photo: Nature/University College London
Some of the rocks from Quebec. Photo: Nature/University College London
Emeritus Professor Malcolm Walter from UNSW. Photo: Marco Del Grande
Emeritus Professor Malcolm Walter from UNSW. Photo: Marco Del Grande
The area of Canada in northern Quebec where the structures were discovered. Photo: Nature/University College London
The area of Canada in northern Quebec where the structures were discovered. Photo: Nature/University College London

Claims published on Thursday in Nature that the world's oldest fossils have been discovered have been challenged by leading experts in the field.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Wodonga news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.