Glenrowan group 'not surprised' at Inland Rail project budget blowout

The Glenrown Improvers group was fighting to save the site of the Kelly Gang's siege three years ago when they opposed a replacement bridge on Beaconsfield Parade as part of the Inland Rail route between Melbourne and Brisbane.

The group said they could have foreseen that an independent review into Inland Rail, released on Thursday morning, would find the project was riddled with problems such as major delays, environmental challenges and inexperienced project managers.

The review into the inland rail, which has been managed by the government-owned Australian Rail Track Corporation and was designed to take freight off roads linking the two capitals, has found the project faces "serious problems" and some work should stop to get costs under control.

Glenrowan Improvers secretary Pam Stirling said the saga surrounding her battle to stop the bridge plan was "probably one of many" which caused costings to blow out along many stages of the project.

"Initially, the ARTC approach was to ask for our opinion about where they could put the new bridge and we gave them an option that would move the bridge directly opposite to the Glenrowan-Moyhu Road.

"It was an existing deserted road and had they used this bridge it would have probably cost around $20 million, as opposed to the bridge that they're putting in now which is costing about between $50 million and $60 million."

The group's president, Helen Senior, said the group gave up their fight when its members realised decisions were being made without community consultation.

"If they had listened to us at the time it would have saved them a lot of money, but they weren't listening," she said. "The review talks about incompetent management, well every time we went in to meet with their representatives we were talking to a different bunch of people, we never saw the same faces."

The review's author, Kerry Schott, said construction of the overall project began "somewhat surprisingly", without knowing where the route would start or finish.

"The detailed and clearly defined scope of much of the route has not yet been settled as approval processes are not complete," Dr Schott wrote in the report.

"Until this scope is firmed, an assessment of schedule and cost cannot be made with confidence."

The coalition government in 2015 said the project would cost $10.7 billion, then $16.4 billion in 2020 and the railway was expected to operate from 2027.

The latest estimate by the government-owned Australian Rail Track Corporation, which manages the Inland Rail, was $31.4 billion with completion expected in the early 2030s.

IN OTHER NEWS:

Dr Schott said that proposed schedule should be regarded with "great caution", particularly as the corporation's poor environmental impact statements had not been approved by the Queensland government.

The rail track corporation's board had "weak" expertise in engineering, safety, environment and sustainability and contracts, something its members raised with coalition government ministers responsible for board appointments, she said.

"Across the entire project, ARTC has pressed ahead trying to make a virtually impossible delivery time, possibly pressed upon them by previous governments," Dr Schott wrote, urging it to stop work and spending on delayed parts of the project.

Dr Schott made several recommendations, including that Inland Rail be made a subsidiary company to allow it greater control of project management and the approvals process.

The project should also focus on being competitive with road transport, offering a 24-hour transit between the two cities, while further independent assessments of costs and scope were needed.

Despite its complex problems, the government should not abandon the project, she said.

"As it stands, inland rail is expected to accommodate and drive a modal shift of 200,000 trucks a year to rail, and this will bring significant benefits in terms of supply chain efficiencies, safety, environmental and congestion reductions."

Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the report revealed the coalition government's "shameful" approach.

"They have let down communities and businesses which have already invested time, effort and money in the prospect of Inland Rail," Ms King said.

"It is now up to the Albanese government to clean up this latest mess and we will do so in a prudent and responsible way."

To read more stories, download The Border Mail news app in the Apple Store or Google Play.

Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can continue to access our trusted content: