Homes must be universal design
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Are these buildings going to be built under the universal design? Are they appropriate for the people who may or will in time need accessible housing, for example parents with prams, post-surgery (crutches/wheelchairs), older persons needing to downsize with wheelie walkers or wheelchairs. Accessibility is for all people at all times in their lives.
Jeanette Baker, Albury
Don't dismiss genuine concerns
After reading the article with Henry Dinning (The Border Mail, June 12), I feel personally insulted and angry.
Chicken Littles....really? Unjustified negative opinions from naysayers...really? Noisy minority...really? What numbers are deemed fair representation? Then to go on and mention the unfounded criticism developers have to put up with. Again, really?
Who is the 'poor me' in this argument? Of course the site needs some form of development but to write inflammatory, insulting statements aimed at the local community expressing genuine concern for the project is not the way to get people on side. Yes, I agree in part - council should be careful when considering this project and not feel bullied into fast-tracking their decision.
Judy White, Albury
IN OTHER NEWS:
Not all the elms needed removing
I applaud Albury Council for altering their plan for the subdivision along Kerr Road in Thurgoona, to enable the hollow bearing trees to be retained.
Maybe a reassessment of the hollows in the avenue of elms in the botanical gardens, that face being cut down, is needed given that only two of the 24 were deemed necessary for removal within five years and the risk assessment didn't identify any trees as unacceptable. Six elm trees were tolerable and the remaining 18 were identified as broadly acceptable with a life span of five to 10 years, and two were assessed as being viable for 10 to 20 years.
Jenny Wallace, Kergunyah
Social housing planning is urgent
Planning is necessary to deal with the homelessness. There is a need to think outside the box. Instead of lumping all this type of housing in one area, Albury Council could allow planning for additional small units to be scattered throughout the city. To integrate social housing would allow some dignity to the many who are unable to fund their own shelter. I suggest this planning is urgently required.
Joy Grinham, West Albury
To read more stories, download The Border Mail news app in the Apple Store or Google Play.
Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can continue to access our trusted content:
- Bookmark https://www.bordermail.com.au/
- Make sure you are signed up for our breaking and regular headlines newsletters
- Follow us on Twitter: @bordermail
- Follow us on Instagram @bordermail
- Follow us on Google News.